Article Tools

Font size
+
Share This
EmailFacebookTwitter

Photo: N/A, License: N/A

A Hunger Action Workshop was recently at Northampton Community College, Monroe Campus in Tannersville, with dozens of food pantry directors, volunteers and community service agencies present. The event served as an opportunity to present the research results of a nutritional food assessment of Monroe County’s emergency and supplemental food providers, in partnership with United Way of Monroe County.

Supplemental food providers from across the region attended, where they received food safety and civil rights training. This also served as an opportunity for agencies to share tips and ideas for better operations and coordination.

The event featured a research presentation from Sydney Huerbin, on the nutritional quality of food pantries in Monroe County, implemented in partnership with United Way and the Pocono Mountains Hunger Coalition.

Huerbin’s research looked at the nutritional quality of foods that are distributed through our community’s emergency and supplemental food system. There is a lot of evidence across the country that food insecurity (about 12 percent in Monroe County) can lead to increased health challenges including obesity and diabetes, in part due to the poor-quality of food that low-income families are able to access because it is often cheaper and more readily available.

“When we think about helping people, it is important for us to work together toward decreasing already existing health disparities, so that we are helping in a constructive way.” said Jennifer Strauch, vice president of community impact at United Way of Monroe County.

Using Feeding America’s “Foods to Encourage” (F2E) guidelines to identify healthier more nutritious foods, Huerbin and her team visited eleven food pantries in the area, looking at food held in storage as well as what was ultimately given out to clients. Her findings? Mixed. When looking at foods stored in the food pantries by weight, nearly 75 percent of the food met the F2E guidelines. However, when looking at food by number of items, the number meeting F2E reduced to 50 percent, and then down to 28 percent when looking at number of items that were actually distributed to small families. Furthermore, when Huerbin and her team compared food pantries that receive support from the state that have dedicated funds to purchase some of their food, compared to those that more heavily rely on donated food, the results showed that the state supported programs were better off. That is, donated food alone may mean less quality.

“There are a bunch of things going on here,” noted Huerbin. “It seems that if agencies have more funds instead of donated food, they are going to be able to provide healthier food. The pantry directors seem to understand the need and value of providing healthy food, but just don’t have the resources to purchase quality food. In addition, though, there likely needs to be some community education, as individuals accessing these pantries may be gravitating toward the less-healthy food. This could mean cooking demos or better information about how to prepare certain healthier foods that are available.”

Sydney Huerbin presents the results of her research.